Received: from relay3.UU.NET (relay3.UU.NET [192.48.96.8]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA20146 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:25:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQaabs22372; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:14:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA01496; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:13:50 -0500
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 14:13:50 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <9601251842.AA00442@garcia.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: c404266@mizzou1.missouri.edu (John Ferrel)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: RE: 3d accelerators for PC
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>.... They rated Diamond's new 3d Edge the highest with the Matrox Millenium
and >the AccelGraphics AG300 trailing in close second and third
respectively. Of the >three only the latter two are said to support OpenGl.
Is lack of OpenGL support a hardware problem or a driver problem? (i.e. If
they improve the drivers, can the Diamond Edge, etc. use Open GL? The
reason I ask is that I am looking to buy a fast Pentium & so many come with
this board... but I want Open GL for the Powerview plug-in, etc.